Don't miss the latest stories
Advertise Newsletter
Network
  • The Creative Finder
  • The Bazaar
  • Deals
  • Status Is Down
Community
  • Sign up / Log in
  • Discussion Forums
  • Calendar of Events
NEW

Follow

Share this

Crypto
Auctions
Books
Entertainment
Film
NFT
Pop Culture
  • Entertainment
  • Film
  • NFT
  • Pop Culture
MENU
  • Advertise with us
  • Submit tip/feedback
  • Work with us
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • Subscribe to RSS
Advertise here
Advertisement

Crypto Group Spent $3M On ‘Dune’ Book, Mistaking It For Rights To The Series

By Alexa Heah, 18 Jan 2022

Subscribe to newsletter
Like us on Facebook
Image via TheSpiceDAO

 

Last year, when a rare copy of a pitch book that director Alejandro Jodorowsky developed for his adaption of the Dune series headed to auction, experts expected it to sell for between US$30,000 and US$40,000. In a stunning surprise, the book ended up going for over US$3 million.


The copy was bought by a cryptocurrency group, TheSpiceDAO, for the staggering price, despite parts of the book already being made available online for free and featured in a documentary about the movie-making process.


However, with this purchase, TheSpiceDao mistakenly assumed it owned the rights to Dune as a whole. The group announced its intentions to make the book public by digitizing the copy, turn its storyboards into a new animated series, and tap digital artists for projects based on the work.


As per The Art Newspaper, the buyer said it would “issue a collection of NFTs that are technically innovative and culturally disruptive,” after which the book would be burned in an “incredible marketing stunt which could be recorded on video.” 

Advertisement
Advertisement


There was just one problem: owning a copy of Jodorowsky’s Dune pitch book is vastly different from owning the rights to the franchise itself. Ultimately, the director’s take was still an adaptation of the original novel by Frank Herbert, of which the collective has no rights to.


In defense of its position, the group said: “While we do not own the IP to Frank Herbert’s masterpiece, we are uniquely positioned with the opportunity to create our own addition to the genre as an homage to the giants who came before us.” 


It’s not quite clear what it means, though Gizmodo posited that anything derived from the auctioned work couldn’t overtly be seen as a reference to Herbert’s or Jodorowsky’s work, especially when the film was created by the powerful Warner Bros studio.


Could the US$3 million bid have been an overly-ambitious mistake? Or did the collective really believe it would own the rights to producing content from the franchise just because it owned the director’s pitch book? We’ll never know.

 

 

 

[via The Art Newspaper and Gizmodo, cover image via TheSpiceDAO]

Receive interesting stories like this one in your inbox
Advertise here

More related news

Advertise here
Also check out these recent news
Web Design
Link to news page

When Your Website Goes Down, This Is the Page Customers Meet Instead

2027
Link to news page

2027 Already Has A Color Of The Year And It’s Beginning On ‘Grounded’ Territory

IKEA
Link to news page

IKEA & Xbox Press Play On Furniture & Storage Inspired By The Iconic Controller

Fashion
Link to news page

Vogue Presents ‘United Flags of Fashion’ With Top Designers For All 50 States

Coca-Cola
Link to news page

Coca-Cola Pours Fresh Life Into Its Iconic Branding With Worldwide Redesign