Don't miss the latest stories
Advertise Newsletter
Network
  • The Creative Finder
  • The Bazaar
  • Deals
  • Status Is Down
Community
  • Sign up / Log in
  • Discussion Forums
  • Calendar of Events
NEW

Follow

Share this

Disputes
AI Generators
Apps
Artificial Intelligence
Copyright
Creativity
Entertainment
More
  • Imaging
  • Law
  • Photography
  • Productivity
  • Video
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Copyright
  • Creativity
  • Entertainment
  • Imaging
  • Law
  • Photography
  • Productivity
  • Video
MENU
  • Advertise with us
  • Submit tip/feedback
  • Work with us
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • Subscribe to RSS
Advertise here
Advertisement

Face-Swapping App Is Being Sued For ‘Exploiting’ The Images Of Celebrities

By Mikelle Leow, 07 Jun 2023

Subscribe to newsletter
Like us on Facebook

Photo 210088477 © Luca Lorenzelli | Dreamstime.com

 

A slap in the face-swap is imminent for creative apps powered by artificial intelligence. Reface, a popular smartphone tool that pastes people’s faces over footage of celebrities, is now battling a lawsuit accusing it of commercially “exploiting” the images of famous figures.


Reface, a Kyiv-based startup, has amassed over 250 million users due to its ability to realistically superimpose celebrities with the faces of users or other stars.


But it now has to face the music of the burgeoning, largely unmoderated world of generative artificial intelligence. Reface has received a proposed class action lawsuit from a finalist on the reality television show Big Brother, Kyland Young, who claims the app has been misusing his image and those of thousands of actors, musicians, and athletes without their permission.

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

 

In a complaint filed with the US District Court for the Central District of California, Young asserted that Reface had violated the class members’ right of publicity in the state, which noted that any individual who “knowingly uses” another person’s name, voice, photograph, signature, or likeness “for purposes of advertising or selling, or soliciting purchases of… services,” without the latter’s prior consent, “shall be liable for any damages sustained by the person or persons injured as a result thereof.”


The dispute is among a slew of pioneering cases centered around generative AI works.

 

Reface hopes to swap the direction of the suit. In a motion to throw out the complaint, filed on May 31, Reface’s parent company NeoCortext argued that Young had failed to adequately build his stance as a publicity claim. And even if he were successful in doing so, publicity claims are preempted by the Copyright Act and barred by the First Amendment, The Fashion Law cites.


NeoCortext declared that Young decided to bring forth a copyright infringement case “masquerading as a right of publicity case” as he wanted to avoid the argument that “as one of many performers in [the] shows [in which he appears], Young almost certainly does not own the copyrights in the shows or photo stills from them.” It pointed out that Young had called out the startup for using “photos and videos of him from the CBS television program, Big Brother, in the free version of its Reface app,” and hence stuck with this angle.

 

 


[via PetaPixel and The Fashion Law, cover photo 210088477 © Luca Lorenzelli | Dreamstime.com]

Receive interesting stories like this one in your inbox
Advertise here

More related news

Advertise here
Also check out these recent news
Web Design
Link to news page

When Your Website Goes Down, This Is the Page Customers Meet Instead

2027
Link to news page

2027 Already Has A Color Of The Year And It’s Beginning On ‘Grounded’ Territory

IKEA
Link to news page

IKEA & Xbox Press Play On Furniture & Storage Inspired By The Iconic Controller

Fashion
Link to news page

Vogue Presents ‘United Flags of Fashion’ With Top Designers For All 50 States

Coca-Cola
Link to news page

Coca-Cola Pours Fresh Life Into Its Iconic Branding With Worldwide Redesign