Several record labels, which include Sony Music and Universal, have accused nonprofit organization Internet Archive of copyright infringement. The lawsuit, a collision of modern digital archiving and decades-old music, is centered around the ‘Great 78 Project’.
Founded with the objective of democratizing access to knowledge, the Internet Archive, headquartered in San Francisco, has garnered a reputation for its comprehensive digital snapshots of websites, books, audio recordings, and assorted historical artifacts. However, the recent litigation throws a spotlight on its practices and principles.
The collective started the Great 78 Project, an endeavor to preserve and share a bygone era of music. This project aims to digitize over 400,000 historical pieces of work, including 78-rpm records, to safeguard them. Many of these are currently under legal scrutiny regarding being housed on the site.
At the heart of the legal battle is a contentious assertion that the Great 78 Project has become a virtual “illegal record store.” Plaintiffs argue that the Archive’s digital repository has surreptitiously transformed into a reservoir for copyrighted musical work by luminaries such as Louis Armstrong, Billie Holiday, Ella Fitzgerald, and Frank Sinatra.
Highlighted in the lawsuit are no less than 2,749 sound-recording copyrights that the labels claim have been encroached upon by the Archive. The financial stakes invoked could see the potential damages balloon to a staggering US$412 million, according to Reuters.
The lawsuit contends that while aiming to preserve yesteryears’ melodies, the Archive’s project is inadvertently hoarding thousands of copyright-protected recordings. Moreover, the songs are purportedly accessible via authorized streaming platforms, minimizing the risk of vanishing into obscurity.