Old logo (above) VS new logo (below). Images via BBC and BBC Select
The BBC has been dealt with Big, Brutal Contempt due to a subtle logo change that it quietly rolled out this year. In hindsight, it was a good thing that the network had kept mum about the change, because internet users have hawked in and are complaining about taxpayers’ money being “
wasted” over a nearly identical version.
The fresh branding, a refresh rather than a redesign, features a smaller font and wider kerning between even initial.
The Sun alleged that the new design system cost “tens of thousands of pounds,” while
Talkradio presenter Mike Graham
cited an estimate of £50,000 (US$69,000).
The reports caused an uproar on social media, with users expressing that they felt ripped off. “[I’d have done] that for them and it would have cost them a KitKat,” one person
wrote.
The BBC is now stepping in to justify the change, whose cost it argues is not “significant.”
“We are simply using our own font – which we own the intellectual rights to – to tidy up the blocks when we update content or
BBC products,” a spokesperson for the broadcaster tells
Metro.co.uk.
The typeface in question is
BBC Reith, named after John Reith, and it replaces the existing use of Gill Sans.
In line with the
BBC’s reasoning, Twitter users familiar with branding design explained that swapping to an in-house typeface would be beneficial in the long run, since the
BBC would no longer have to pay for licensing fees to use Gill Sans.
The change had flown over most heads for some months, having been used by streaming service BBC Select since February. The
BBC will officially adopt the new logo on television screens in the fall.
[via
NME,
Metro.co.uk and
Creative Bloq, images via various sources]