Don't miss the latest stories
Advertise Newsletter
Network
  • The Creative Finder
  • The Bazaar
  • Deals
  • Status Is Down
Community
  • Sign up / Log in
  • Discussion Forums
  • Calendar of Events
NEW

Follow

Share this

Cars
Artificial Intelligence
Automotive
Disputes
Google
Innovation
Technology
  • Disputes
  • Google
  • Innovation
  • Technology
MENU
  • Advertise with us
  • Submit tip/feedback
  • Work with us
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • Subscribe to RSS
Advertise here
Advertisement

Robotaxi Companies Given Green Light To Operate Cabs 24/7 In San Francisco

By Nicole Rodrigues, 15 Aug 2023

Subscribe to newsletter
Like us on Facebook
Photo 176000441© Andreistanescu| Dreamstime.com

 

Google’s Waymo and GM’s Cruise have just secured regulatory approval from the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) to introduce fare charges for fully driverless rides in San Francisco. The CPUC’s decision, which passed with a majority vote of 3 to 1, marks a pivotal milestone in advancing autonomous transportation services.

 

Since 2018, Waymo has operated a fleet of 200 autonomous vehicles throughout San Francisco, while in 2022, Cruise popped up onto the scene and currently has 300 cars on its roster. Before the CPUC’s approval, Cruise was restricted to offering fared passenger rides in specific areas between 10 and six a.m. without a safety driver on board. In contrast, Waymo’s operational model allowed them to charge passengers at any time with a safety driver present.

 

Waymo has also stated that it is ready to start incrementally welcoming new riders to its services, and it apparently has 100,000 people already on its waiting list.

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

The CPUC’s decision to greenlight the expansion has unlocked the potential for 24/7 fared rides across San Francisco. According to The San Francisco Standard, the commission’s president Alice Reynolds and commissioners Darcie Houck and John Reynolds collectively voted in favor of the expansion, while Commissioner Genevieve Shiroma stood in opposition. Shiroma’s stance was rooted in the contention that the CPUC’s evaluation lacked adequate information to thoroughly assess autonomous vehicles’ implications on first responders.

 

Throughout the decision-making process, public concerns regarding the safety of autonomous vehicles were considered. Furthermore, testimonies emphasizing the technology’s potential benefits for older people and individuals with disabilities played a vital role in shaping the final verdict.

 

According to Mashable, citizens of the city have been concerned for various reasons, including the safety of pedestrians and other traffic concerns. An anti-car activist group, Safe Street Rebel, has even led protests against the insurgence of AVs.

 

 

 

[via Mashable and USA TODAY, cover photo 176000441© Andreistanescu| Dreamstime.com]

Receive interesting stories like this one in your inbox
Advertise here

More related news

Advertise here
Also check out these recent news
Web Design
Link to news page

When Your Website Goes Down, This Is the Page Customers Meet Instead

2027
Link to news page

2027 Already Has A Color Of The Year And It’s Beginning On ‘Grounded’ Territory

IKEA
Link to news page

IKEA & Xbox Press Play On Furniture & Storage Inspired By The Iconic Controller

Fashion
Link to news page

Vogue Presents ‘United Flags of Fashion’ With Top Designers For All 50 States

Coca-Cola
Link to news page

Coca-Cola Pours Fresh Life Into Its Iconic Branding With Worldwide Redesign